I recently bumped into something valuable on Twitter. Now, that may sound hypocritical coming from me, but hear me out. I know I usually rail against the people who have followed me on Twitter (the onslaught of pornographers and investment scam artists), but Midge, thank you Midge, you most definitely broke that mold. Midge's website: www.MidgeRaymond.com is a great resource for readers and writers. She's recently written a post about the book TwiTTerature.
Here's the plot: two college kids are retelling the classics of literature in Twitter format. Unfortunately it's nonfiction. I recommend her article "Twitterature: It's what's on the Syllabus." (Link: http://www.midgeraymond.com/blog/?paged=2)
Like Midge, I'm in the demographic that is sometimes cranky about Twitter. OK, unlike Midge, I'm downright cantankerous about Twitter, so Midge I apologize for throwing you in the mud-wrestling arena here with me.
TwiTTerature? Yes they've capitalized the middle "t" letters. Clever branding tactic or are they so tweeted out that they've forgotten the initial cap goes, well, at the beginning? Nevertheless, how can the plot of a book, the nuances of a book's characters, or the subtleties of the voice and tone of an author be compressed into 140 characters? Seriously. Aren't a lot of book titles longer than 140 characters?